SIMPLY BOOKABLE

My client was a new hotel. They were looking to create an online booking experience that was simple and based on a deep understanding of their target users. My task was to focus on the booking process for their new website.
How can customers book a hotel room online quickly and successfully?
THE CHALLENGE
Booking a hotel room online should be a simple process but, sometimes, it can feel complex. I needed to design a booking process that would be less complex, reduce user friction and increase user confidence and successfully avoid pitfalls that other competitors may be been encountering which could result in a loss of bookings.
MY ROLE
I led this booking process project from the initial research stage through to a medium/high fidelity prototype. I defined the problem areas and designed solutions from collated research.
THE GOAL
I wanted to create a short, simple and effective booking process which allowed all key information to be present within one main flow. I wanted to generate user confidence which I believed would help increase conversion rates on the site.
MY JOURNEY

Looking at the industry

Premier Inn and The Sheraton Marriott*, (bigger hotelier chains) Hotel Du Vin, and Alexander House. (boutique and bespoke)
* The Sheraton Marriott website has been redesigned post my research

Early insights revealed...

that sites chose different ways to access the initial search. The Premier Inn made their search bar immediately obvious.
This was found in the centre of the screen high up in the view port.

The other hotel sites used CTA style bookable buttons within their top main navigational bars or at the bottom of the viewport which then revealed an off screen search field.

What’s working well?

The booking search bars all followed a common format with all key information you would expect to be asked when entering in your check in details. Some had useful additional features such as auto save results so that you could return to them later.  A indication that customers could be leaving the site and then returning to the booking process later.

Hotel Du Vin had a really simple search form field. The form was top aligned and stacked as a vertical list, with drop down selection field. It was accessible off screen via a BOOK A ROOM CTA.
Another observation I made was that most sites have a progress bar of the booking journey. 
I felt this was an important feature and would generate an increase of confidence from the customer.

After completing the details in the booking field, Hotel Du Vin provided an informative booking summary panel which was present at each stage of the booking process, allowing the customer to view or edit their search at any point during the booking process.

And where things got tricky...

The room selection pages became more complex with the larger brands, Premier Inn and The Sheraton.

The Premier Inn did contained a lot of useful information. Main sections were clearly divided into four sections; hotel information, location, room type and restaurant. However the additional options within these sections became confusing. The hierarchy of information began to lose clarity, some clickable links with pop out boxes were small and could easily be missed despite being underlined.

The Sheraton did the same. Within the page there were options you could select to enhance your stay, however these were accessible under small understated drop down menus and upon my first visit I missed these.

So in comparison...

The boutique hotels Alexander House and Hotel Du Vin took a different approach. 
Although sectioned in a similar way, it was the hierarchy of the content that worked well. The size and placement of headlines. The description and language within each section that brought an instant clarity 
to the process.

Additional information was clearly highlighted as a button or a coloured link, and the links used helpful language such as ‘MORE DETAILS’ or ‘SHOW ROOM RATES’ to indicate you needed to click them.

The overall layout of the pages were more digestible. Both sites contained a progress bar so you could see where you were in the journey.

On both these hotels you could also edit your search details, these options were easily found within their own sections on the page.

And what I discovered?

From this research it was obvious to me that the boutique hotels had a much simpler booking system with a clearer user flow. They used language effectively to communicate to customers allowing them to navigate through their site. They also gave the customer control to easily amend and change their details without interrupting the flow of their booking.
After an initial exploration of the hotel industry, I chose to focus and compare four particular hotel chains.
I wanted to compare well known hoteliers against some smaller boutique hotels. I was hoping this would give me a broader perspective of what others are doing. I wanted to know what similarities there might be between the sites. What differences would there be from a site which contained a lot of content compared to a smaller site that might delivery a more bespoke service.

Customer insights

I conducted a short 10 question survey and sent it out to participants who had either booked a hotel recently and/or who regularly booked hotels. This gave me a better understanding of how customers viewed the booking process and these were the key insights.
Most popular
A big deal to compare
Location is key
Bookings.com was a well frequented site in customer searches. Customers liked how they had the control and resources to book their trips.

“It allows me to create my  
holiday, my way.”
All participants said they compared various sites before booking, and checking with the hotel directly was also another part of obtaining the best price. Comparisons were  driven by obtaining the best value for money.
When asked what you looked for when booking, common requests were types of amenities within the room, hotel and surrounding area. 
The majority mentioned location details were important.
Take your time
How long?
Booking preference
Around 90% of the participants said they didn’t complete a booking task the same day saying they needed to confer with fellow companions to firm up details.
When ready to book, 
most participants said they expected the process to 
take between 10-30 mins 
to complete.
There was mix of device choice. Interestingly one said initially they may search on their phone but when they had more time they would also check on a computer or tablet device get a better view of imagery, location and compare with other sites.

Getting richer content

By obtaining qualitative data I was able to delve deeper into discovering where common issues laid within the booking process. It was good way to understand what customers were looking for and how they went about the booking process.

And this revealed...

After orchestrating some usability tests. I found common key points. These points are summarised below:
  • All customers said that they would compare several booking sites before completing the process.
  • All looked for good value for money. They wanted to ensure they’d found the best deal.
  • Any promotional discounts were viewed during the process.
  • Reviews were very important to participants and swayed decision making on bookings.
“I would definitely look at the feedback,
I think it’s really, really important.”
COMMENT REGARDING REVIEWS
  • Location was also very important to all participants, It was expected that they would be able to view a map of the hotel location during the booking journey.
  • Photography was very important, plenty of visuals of the hotel and rooms was expected, lack of photography was received negatively and participants would lose trust in the hotelier.
  • Detailed room description and amenities increased customer confidence, one felt they were getting more for their money when presented with a detailed list.
“Yep, absolutely. I will always have google maps up, opened on another tab. ”
CUSTOMER RESPONSE TO A QUESTION REGARDING LOCATION
  • Details given during the booking process on room cancellation was also important to the participants and built confidence
  • Participants would get frustrated when the had to scroll for any length of time to find information.
  • There were times when information was missed by the customer because it’s location was not where the customer expected to find it.
  • Unclear placement of information, confusing language and design on page elements were a common cause of friction.
“I don’t know at this stage whether I should be clicking or just looking. ”
CUSTOMER RESPONSE ON SEARCHING THROUGH A CATEGORY LIST
  • Participants mentions on some sites it was difficult to compare that site with others due to poor summary of information.
  • Users would often go back in the journey process to try and find information that was missing. 
If they were still unable to find this information it would add to user friction.

Getting to the heart of it

Patterns were all ready starting to emerge. It was now time to collate all my research focus on creating 
a process that would work effectively for the customer.
The most problematic stage of the booking process appeared to be between the results page and the room selection. The most user friction was encountered here.
Location
Progress bar
Filters and Edits
This was important to the customer, they praised it if they found it easily and it caused discontent if the information was missing. It was clear a map and location details would need to be included in the booking process design.
Customers would start to get lost in the process whilst rooting for information, going back and forth between pages, making it evident a progress bar would be beneficial in the design.
It was also important give the customer the control to be able to edit their search results.
Customer feedback
Content display
Language
A recurring observation was the importance of reviews. Customer confidence increased when they were able to see reviews onsite, 
or a link through to Trip Advisor.
Content and the way it’s displayed contributed greatly to customer experience. It was evident that rooting around or scrolling through information was not favoured. Key information needed to be visible in the viewport and displayed in a way which would meet customer affordances. Bring the content to the customer.
Considering the language used onsite is important. Clear use of description and instruction, would increase confidence, speed the process up and reduce customer confusion.

Designing the solution

I created a single flow diagram of a booking process incorporating the fundamental points I had discovered.

Time to get sketching

I sketched out my design plan in detail to see how it would work before building the prototype. 
I created detailed notes on each stage of the process. Below is a visual of the wireframes.

Simply bookable prototype

DESKTOP PROTOTYPE
MOBILE PROTOTYPE

Task instructions for prototype flow:

The customer journey flow consists of selecting, booking and paying for a hotel room at a Luxie Stay hotel in London.

For the relevance of this flow we will assume the customer has already explored the hotel website and is now at the stage where they are ready to book.

The prototype test is set at a medium fidelity. During the task you may find inactive tabs and CALL TO ACTION buttons. This is because these areas are not part of the current flow we are testing.
Here is the information you need to complete the journey:
1. You are looking to book a one week stay at a hotel in London between the dates
of 09/09/2023 and 16/09/2023.
2. You are looking to book a classic room for 2 adults.
3. You are interested to know where your hotel will be located in London.
4. You would like to include a bottle of champagne on arrival as it is a special occasion.
5. You also have a birthday voucher of £20 to use for a discount on your stay.
6. For the purpose of this test you would like to pay now rather than pay on arrival.

My Learnings

There was a need to simplify the booking process. I understood through research that the majority of customers will be comparing my site with competitors and they may not always book on their first visit. So it was important that the site was designed in a way where details could easily be referred back to and comparable with other sites. Room types were designed so they could be scan-able in a quick view format.

I discovered what key elements the customers were looking for and made sure there was easy access and visibility to these during the booking process such as maps and reviews.

Where possible, especially at the beginning of the journey. I kept key content within the view port. I included a progress bar so the customer could see how long the process would take.

I learned that having an ‘shop-able bag’ (summary panel) ensured that the customer could see and edit their details at all stages of the booking process.

The most important lesson I learned in the booking process is the consideration of language. 
Using well versed headlines, content description and simple instructions for CTAs. This really helped keep the user journey smoother, quicker and a more enjoyable experience.

I only focused on one user flow in this project and used the assumption that previous research had been completed by the customer prior to this flow. However I could clearly see how this process could be made  even more flexible when crossing over with other natural customer flows. Customers would definitely dip in and out of information on the rest of the site before committing to this final booking process.

Simply bookable

My client was a new hotel. They were looking to create an online booking experience that was simple and based on a deep understanding of their target users. My task was to focus on the booking process for their new website.
How can customers book a hotel room online quickly and successfully?

THE CHALLENGE

Booking a hotel room online should be a simple process but, sometimes, it can feel complex. I needed to design a booking process that would be less complex, reduce user friction and increase user confidence and successfully avoid pitfalls that other competitors may be been encountering which could result in a loss of bookings.

MY ROLE

I led this booking process project from the initial research stage through to a medium/high fidelity prototype. I defined the problem areas and designed solutions from collated research.

THE GOAL

I wanted to create a short, simple and effective booking process which allowed all key information to be present within one main flow. I wanted to generate user confidence which I believed would help increase conversion rates on the site.

MY JOURNEY

Looking at the industry

After an initial exploration of the hotel industry, I chose to focus and compare four particular hotel chains.

Premier Inn and The Sheraton Marriott*,
(bigger hotelier chains)

Hotel Du Vin, and Alexander House.
(boutique and bespoke)

I wanted to compare well known hoteliers against some smaller boutique hotels. I was hoping this would give me a broader perspective of what others are doing. I wanted to know what similarities there might be between the sites. What differences would there be from a site which contained a lot of content compared to a smaller site that might delivery a more bespoke service.
* The Sheraton Marriott website has been redesigned post my research

Early insights revealed...

that sites chose different ways to access the initial search. The Premier Inn made their search bar immediately obvious. This was found in the centre of the screen high up in the view port.

The other hotel sites used CTA style bookable buttons within their top main navigational bars or at the bottom of the viewport which then revealed an off screen search field.

What’s working well?

The booking search bars all followed a common format with all key information you would expect to be asked when entering in your check in details. Some had useful additional features such as auto save results so that you could return to them later.  A indication that customers could be leaving the site and then returning to the booking process later.

Hotel Du Vin had a really simple search form field. The form was top aligned and stacked as a vertical list, with drop down selection field. It was accessible off screen via a BOOK A ROOM CTA.
Another observation I made was that most sites have a progress bar of the booking journey. 
I felt this was an important feature and would generate an increase of confidence from the customer.

After completing the details in the booking field, Hotel Du Vin provided an informative booking summary panel which was present at each stage of the booking process, allowing the customer to view or edit their search at any point during the booking process.

And where things got tricky...

The room selection pages became more complex with the larger brands, Premier Inn and The Sheraton.

The Premier Inn did contained a lot of useful information. Main sections were clearly divided into four sections; hotel information, location, room type and restaurant. However the additional options within these sections became confusing. The hierarchy of information began to lose clarity, some clickable links with pop out boxes were small and could easily be missed despite being underlined.

The Sheraton did the same. Within the page there were options you could select to enhance your stay, however these were accessible under small understated drop down menus and upon my first visit I missed these.

So in comparison...

The boutique hotels Alexander House and Hotel Du Vin took a different approach. 
Although sectioned in a similar way, it was the hierarchy of the content that worked well. The size and placement of headlines. The description and language within each section that brought an instant clarity 
to the process.

Additional information was clearly highlighted as a button or a coloured link, and the links used helpful language such as ‘MORE DETAILS’ or ‘SHOW ROOM RATES’ to indicate you needed to click them.

The overall layout of the pages were more digestible. Both sites contained a progress bar so you could see where you were in the journey.

On both these hotels you could also edit your search details, these options were easily found within their own sections on the page.

And what I discovered?

From this research it was obvious to me that the boutique hotels had a much simpler booking system with a clearer user flow. They used language effectively to communicate to customers allowing them to navigate through their site. They also gave the customer control to easily amend and change their details without interrupting the flow of their booking.

CUSTOMER INSIGHTS

I conducted a short 10 question survey and sent it out to participants who had either booked a hotel recently and/or who regularly booked hotels. This gave me a better understanding of how customers viewed the booking process and these were the key insights.
MOST POPULAR
Bookings.com was a well frequented site in customer searches. Customers liked how they had the control and resources to book their trips.

“It allows me to create my  holiday, my way.”
A BIG DEAL TO COMPARE
All participants said they compared various sites before booking, and checking with the hotel directly was also another part of obtaining the best price. Comparisons were  driven by obtaining the best value for money.
LOCATION IS KEY
When asked what you looked for when booking, common requests were types of amenities within the room, hotel and surrounding area. 
The majority mentioned location details were important.
TAKE YOUR TIME
Around 90% of the participants said they didn’t complete a booking task the same day saying they needed to confer with fellow companions to firm up details.
HOW LONG?
When ready to book, 
most participants said they expected the process to 
take between 10-30 mins 
to complete.
BOOKING PREFERENCE
There was mix of device choice. Interestingly one said initially they may search on their phone but when they had more time they would also check on a computer or tablet device get a better view of imagery, location and compare with other sites.

Getting richer content

By obtaining qualitative data I was able to delve deeper into discovering where common issues laid within the booking process. It was good way to understand what customers were looking for and how they went about the booking process.

And this revealed...

After orchestrating some usability tests. I found common key points. These points are summarised below:
“I would definitely look at the feedback, I think it’s really, really important.”
COMMENT REGARDING REVIEWS
“Yep, absolutely. I will always have google maps up, opened on another tab. ”
CUSTOMER RESPONSE TO A QUESTION REGARDING LOCATION
“I don’t know at this stage whether I should be clicking or just looking. ”
CUSTOMER RESPONSE ON SEARCHING THROUGH A CATEGORY LIST

GETTING TO THE HEART OF IT

Patterns were all ready starting to emerge. It was now time to collate all my research focus on creating 
a process that would work effectively for the customer.
The most problematic stage of the booking process appeared to be between the results page and the room selection. The most user friction was encountered here.
LOCATION
This was important to the customer, they praised it if they found it easily and it caused discontent if the information was missing. It was clear a map and location details would need to be included in the booking process design.
PROGRESS BAR
Customers would start to get lost in the process whilst rooting for information, going back and forth between pages, making it evident a progress bar would be beneficial in the design.
FILTERS AND EDITS
It was also important give the customer the control to be able to edit their search results.
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
A recurring observation was the importance of reviews. Customer confidence increased when they were able to see reviews onsite, 
or a link through to Trip Advisor.
CONTENT DISPLAY
Content and the way it’s displayed contributed greatly to customer experience. It was evident that rooting around or scrolling through information was not favoured. Key information needed to be visible in the viewport and displayed in a way which would meet customer affordances. Bring the content to the customer.
LANGUAGE
Considering the language used onsite is important. Clear use of description and instruction, would increase confidence, speed the process up and reduce customer confusion.

Designing the solution

I created a single flow diagram of a booking process incorporating the fundamental points I had discovered.

Time to get sketching

I sketched out my design plan in detail to see how it would work before building the prototype. 
I created detailed notes on each stage of the process. Below is a visual of the wireframes.

SIMPLY BOOKABLE PROTOTYPE

DESKTOP PROTOTYPE
MOBILE PROTOTYPE

Task instructions:

The customer journey flow consists of selecting, booking and paying for a hotel room at a Luxie Stay hotel in London.

For the relevance of this flow we will assume the customer has already explored the hotel website and is now at the stage where they are ready to book.

The prototype test is set at a medium fidelity. During the task you may find inactive tabs and CALL TO ACTION buttons. This is because these areas are not part of the current flow we are testing.
Here is the information you need to complete the test:

1. You are looking to book a one week stay at a hotel in London between the dates of 09/09/2023 and 16/09/2023.

2. You are looking to book a classic room for 2 adults.

3. You are interested to know where your hotel will be located in London.

4. You would like to include a bottle of champagne on arrival as it is a special occasion.

5. You also have a birthday voucher of £20 to use for a discount on your stay.

6. For the purpose of this test you would like to pay now rather than pay on arrival.

My Learnings

There was a need to simplify the booking process. I understood through research that the majority of customers will be comparing my site with competitors and they may not always book on their first visit. So it was important that the site was designed in a way where details could easily be referred back to and comparable with other sites. Room types were designed so they could be scan-able in a quick view format.

I discovered what key elements the customers were looking for and made sure there was easy access and visibility to these during the booking process such as maps and reviews.

Where possible, especially at the beginning of the journey. I kept key content within the view port. I included a progress bar so the customer could see how long the process would take.

I learned that having an ‘shop-able bag’ (summary panel) ensured that the customer could see and edit their details at all stages of the booking process.

The most important lesson I learned in the booking process is the consideration of language. 
Using well versed headlines, content description and simple instructions for CTAs. This really helped keep the user journey smoother, quicker and a more enjoyable experience.

I only focused on one user flow in this project and used the assumption that previous research had been completed by the customer prior to this flow. However I could clearly see how this process could be made  even more flexible when crossing over with other natural customer flows. Customers would definitely dip in and out of information on the rest of the site before committing to this final booking process.
Back to top